Probabilistic sophistication and variational preferences
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper shows that in the class of variational preferences the notion of probabilistic sophistication is equivalent to expected utility as long as there exists at least one event such that the independence axiom holds for bets on that event. This extends a result of Marinacci (2002) and provides a novel interpretation of his result. ∗This note is a revised and extended version of Chapter 9 of my dissertation at Northwestern University; some of the results were also reported in my job market paper. Part of this research was done while I was visiting the Economic Theory Center at Princeton University, to which I’m very grateful for its support and hospitality. I would like to thank Eddie Dekel, Peter Klibanoff, Massimo Marinacci, Jan Werner, as well as an associate editor and a referee for their very helpful comments and suggestions. All errors are my own. This version: October 26, 2010. †Department of Economics, Harvard University. E-mail: tomasz [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Unbounded probabilistic sophistication
I extend Machina and Schmeidler’s (1992) model of probabilistic sophistication to unbounded uncertain prospects (acts) and derive risk preferences over the induced probability distributions (lotteries) with unbounded support. For example, risk preferences can be derived over normal, exponential, and Poisson families of probability distributions. My extension uses a version of Arrow’s (1970) Mon...
متن کامل‘Expected utility / subjective probability’ analysis without the sure-thing principle or probabilistic sophistication
The basic analytical concepts, tools and results of the classical expected utility/subjective probability model of risk preferences and beliefs under subjective uncertainty can be extended to general “event-smooth” preferences over subjective acts that do not necessarily satisfy either of the key behavioral assumptions of the classical model, namely the Sure-Thing Principle or the Hypothesis of...
متن کاملAmbiguity in the Context of Probabilistic Beliefs¤
When are a decision maker's preferences compatible with speci ̄ed probabilistic beliefs? We propose two de ̄nitions of \compatibility" as possible answers to this question. The weaker one requires simply that the decision maker prefer to bet on an event whenever it is more likely. It is shown that under regularity conditions there exists a unique (incomplete) maximal comparative likelihood relati...
متن کاملComonotone Pareto Optimal Allocations for Law Invariant
In this paper we prove the existence of Pareto optimal allocations of integrable random endowments when decision makers have probabilistic sophisticated variational preferences. Variational preferences were introduced and axiomatically characterized by Maccheroni, Marinacci, and Rustichini (2006). This broad class of preferences allows to model ambiguity aversion and includes several subclasses...
متن کاملPareto Optimal Allocations for Law Invariant Robust Utilities
In this paper we prove the existence of Pareto optimal allocations of integrable random endowments when decision makers have probabilistic sophisticated variational preferences. Variational preferences were introduced and axiomatically characterized by Maccheroni, Marinacci, and Rustichini (2006). This broad class of preferences allows to model ambiguity aversion and includes several subclasses...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 146 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011